Fork me on GitHub
#reagent
<
2015-06-18
>
escherize04:06:52

sorry what do you mean by "the values have to bubble up to the parent container"?

phil09:06:13

Do people tend to use reagent-utils/session, or like to pass around an app object explicitly?

phil09:06:00

I feel like session is just a nice wrapper for a global variable, with lots of the potential foibles.

braai engineer09:06:07

Is this the right place to ask about reagent frameworks like re-frame?

braai engineer09:06:22

I'm having a hard time structuring reusable components with re-frame.

zoldar09:06:16

@petrus: what's issues do you experience with that? I'm curious because I'm sinking my teeth into it just about right now.

mikethompson11:06:04

@petrus: have you looked at re-com? It works with re-frame.

braai engineer11:06:27

yeah, none of the components seem to be nested components, though.

mikethompson11:06:38

Nested components?

mikethompson11:06:31

I have to head off, but look at the way re-com components are written. We don't have any problem mixing re-com and re-frame.

zoldar14:06:53

regarding re-com - is allowing only goog.date.UtcDateTime as input for datepicker's 'model' intentional? or was goog.date.DateTime overlooked?

gadfly36115:06:21

@phil I dont use session/util in my projects, but I can see their value - just convenience if one wants it.

gadfly36115:06:25

@petrus if you lool at the re-com demo page, a lot of them take hiccup as one of the inputs