This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-05-20
Channels
- # announcements (27)
- # aws (1)
- # beginners (62)
- # boot (5)
- # calva (56)
- # clj-kondo (6)
- # cljdoc (3)
- # cljsrn (4)
- # clojure (65)
- # clojure-dev (17)
- # clojure-europe (2)
- # clojure-italy (17)
- # clojure-nl (24)
- # clojure-spec (30)
- # clojure-uk (14)
- # clojurescript (35)
- # clr (7)
- # cursive (8)
- # data-science (3)
- # datascript (38)
- # datomic (15)
- # emacs (16)
- # fulcro (34)
- # hyperfiddle (1)
- # immutant (1)
- # luminus (7)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (38)
- # pedestal (2)
- # planck (10)
- # re-frame (7)
- # reagent (7)
- # reitit (9)
- # shadow-cljs (36)
- # sql (19)
- # tools-deps (11)
- # vim (64)
- # xtdb (18)
I think it would be handy for the shorthand input signal (`:<-`) to support forwarding the arguments from the handling subscription. I can see needing to do that more often than hard coding arguments. I can see cases when you wouldn't want it to forward so maybe something optional. What are peoples thoughts on this?
Also I'm aware you can use the anonymous function variant to get that behaviour
@lilactown yes, that makes sense, thanks!
Hello guys
@caleb.macdonaldblack yeah, I almost regret facilitating the shortcut :<-
as an alternative to writing a signal functions Almost. It is certainly easier to explain, and understand, when there is only one way to do something. Sugar is seldom good. :-)
Fair enough. I might break the habit and start using the function instead