This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-03-08
Channels
- # aws (3)
- # beginners (126)
- # boot (19)
- # cider (31)
- # cljs-dev (324)
- # clojure (96)
- # clojure-boston (2)
- # clojure-denver (9)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (2)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-losangeles (1)
- # clojure-spec (18)
- # clojure-uk (59)
- # clojurebridge (1)
- # clojurescript (184)
- # community-development (29)
- # cursive (2)
- # datascript (2)
- # datomic (5)
- # emacs (1)
- # figwheel (6)
- # fulcro (270)
- # hoplon (2)
- # jobs (1)
- # jobs-discuss (1)
- # keyboards (2)
- # leiningen (2)
- # london-clojurians (2)
- # luminus (10)
- # mount (1)
- # off-topic (26)
- # onyx (8)
- # other-languages (1)
- # parinfer (1)
- # protorepl (6)
- # re-frame (23)
- # reagent (61)
- # reitit (5)
- # shadow-cljs (100)
- # spacemacs (3)
- # sql (19)
- # unrepl (90)
- # vim (25)
Hello all, Is there any way to only get value from subscribe without reacting the changes?
@fabrao see FAQ entry
Why does re-com
prefer passing parameters to components as [& {:keys [a b c]}]
instead of just using [{:keys [a b c]}]
? Is it just because Reagent tries to get :key
from the first map in the list of arguments?
The advantage of simple maps is that it's easy to format them nicely and much simpler to pass them down to children. Whereas with [& {:keys [...] :as args}]
I think you have to use (apply concat args)
.
Whats the closest way to use the re-frame pattern but still use javascript? Should be something like react + redux + rxjs?
@pablore I've been trying to bring a new JS-only hire into Clojure and re-frame via Redux ... if you squint it seems to provide a lot of what I've come to value in re-frame
the subscription layer seems a little more diffuse in Redux but that could just be my relative ignorance
I’m trying to mantain a codebase some very special angular people made in react + redux… and its a mess
Found this on using all three together ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AslncyG8whg ... again with being a bit surprised what comes out of the box with re-frame.
Found this on using all three together ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AslncyG8whg ... again with being a bit surprised what comes out of the box with re-frame.
since re-frame event handlers aren't registered with vars, it's not possible to ^{:doc "Documentation"}
them
options for documenting event handlers besides comments?
Open an issue @joelsanchez, we could probably do with an approach for handling Clojure spec too
if you end up doing that, it will begin to look very much like my websocket endpoints api 😂