re-frame 0.10.2 is out https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/releases/tag/v0.10.2

thank you @danielcompton, great tops on the polling-interval effect on the FAQ https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/blob/master/docs/FAQs/PollADatabaseEvery60.md Noticed also CQRS backend is recommended for re-frame https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/blob/master/docs/FAQs/FullStackReframe.md, is it because it matches better with the even-driven nature of re-frame itself?

Reading at the FAQ about clear-subscription-cache! , I’m wondering if the new error boundaries on React 16 -when Reagent eventually take advantage of it- will allow re-frame to dispose correctly ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69ewg9zzDVQ&feature=youtu.be&a=

An early prototype. More at https://github.com/Respo/reel . I'm wondering if re-frame does that?

I think re-frisk doest that https://github.com/flexsurfer/re-frisk

@jiyinyiyong in addition to re-frisk ... there's also re-frame-undo and re-frame-trace which are related. The later is still under development

@mikethompson will re-frame-trace will available as profile in re-frame-template?

@lovuikeng once it gets more solid, yes

But there's still a bit to do

😛 I prefer my own solution since I don't use React, thus mine can be simpler

I don't have a beautiful devtools for Respo though.

Both respo and reel don't seem to be related to re-frame except for the look 'n feel

Respo is my own virtual DOM lib. I'm not really into Reagent and barely used re-frame. I just think the ideas behind use are similar. And we both get ideas from Elm and Redux.

This is a beginner question. I'm looking at the braid repository ( a chat app in clj/cljs using re-frame) and im curious about a small detail about events. I cant find out how this syntax works https://github.com/braidchat/braid/blob/master/src/braid/client/gateway/helper_views.cljs#L13

specifically the

(on-change-transform (.. e -target -value))

I think (.. e -target -value) is equivalent to the threading macro (-> e .-target .-value), which unrolled would be (.-value (.-target e))

but (.. whatever) is only in JS.

(js equivalent would be, of course, good 'ol e.target.value)

without the dash it gets interpreted into JS as e.target().value(), ie. chained method calls.

Thank you

I'd strongly recommend against not using that notation though.

It doesn't work well with :advanced optimization at all.

Instead, do all member access using https://github.com/binaryage/cljs-oops