This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-04-30
Channels
- # asami (10)
- # babashka (14)
- # beginners (71)
- # calva (56)
- # cider (8)
- # cljs-dev (3)
- # clojure (111)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-europe (19)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-uk (147)
- # clojurescript (4)
- # cursive (8)
- # datalog (1)
- # datomic (19)
- # emacs (4)
- # graalvm (32)
- # helix (14)
- # jackdaw (7)
- # jobs-discuss (10)
- # juxt (4)
- # lsp (3)
- # malli (47)
- # meander (6)
- # off-topic (29)
- # portal (6)
- # re-frame (1)
- # react (3)
- # reitit (24)
- # releases (1)
- # remote-jobs (4)
- # reveal (33)
- # rewrite-clj (3)
- # shadow-cljs (5)
- # sql (10)
- # tools-deps (4)
- # vim (7)
- # xtdb (151)
is portal more or less as stable and mature as rebl?
I still plan to add more features: reactivity for mutable objects, custom viewers, general extensibility and performance improvements. For the most part the ux should remain similar. I haven't used REBL a lot so I'm not sure how to compare. Are there specific issues you are worried about?
Portal is usable for daily development as I use it every day for work. Before every release, I go through a series of regression tests to ensure things still work.
thanks for the response! no, no specific issues.
While I can't speak to its maturity compared to rebl, it is definitely stable enough. I also use it daily at work. It's a fantastic tool, especially for large data structures! Shadow-cljs has its tap inspector for free, but I always reach for portal instead. It's much easier to use and parse data with.