Many are probably wondering why there has been so little activity here in recent months. First, I gave myself some time off during the summer. Then I started a new job as a Clojure developer, with the role of Principal Software Engineer, where I was given a very demanding task to rewrite the heart of their system. It has taken a lot of time and energy, which has made me take it easy with Polylith. Now a lot is in place in the new solution and I don't feel the same pressure anymore. The next big thing in the pipeline is to have the poly tool support ClojureScript. I'm a typical backend developer, and would therefore like to bring one or more people into the project as we develop this. I'm looking for someone who knows frontend development in cljs + shadow-cljs and who is willing to work with the Polylith codebase long-term. It's good if you also master clj development, as the tool is written in it. I think it can be exciting for everyone involved, including me! I see this as an opportunity to bring new developers into the project. I will continue to write code, solve issues and be the main responsible, and ensure that we have a thriving project! If you are interested, send me a DM!
"Welcome back!" 🙂 I submitted some PRs a while back. LMK if you have Qs about those. Three are very minor and straightforward. The fourth is somewhat speculative and needs more work but I wanted to discuss the approach first (we're relying on it at work so...).
Thanks, will have a look!
Sorry, but I merged your PR's in the wrong order, so now I have conflicts in https://github.com/polyfy/polylith/pull/519 one @seancorfield. Is that something that is easy to fix for you?
I was expecting you'd want to talk at some length about the Selmer templates one 🙂 There were no tests or docs in that one...
The change in 519 is minimal: wherever there is .calva/output-window/output.calva-repl, just add .calva/repl.calva-repl
The tests were green, and then I had the idea to test more.
...before building a snapshot release.
We're using the Selmer template stuff at work already. We have per-workspace templates with copyright notices and different test setups...
I will have another look on this one, now when it's merged! 😀
I can do a new PR to replace 519 if you'd prefer I do the work? Might not happen today tho'...
You'll probably find my other PRs conflict too since at least one other was modifying the generated files (which have now moved from code to templates).
I resolved the conflict. The tests are running now...
Ah, the 1.12 PR relies on clojure-ver so it won't conflict (I just updating it from master).
Yes
Thank you for merging all four of those! LMK if/when you want to chat about the Selmer template stuff.
Here's an example of what we have at work:
{:deps {org.clojure/clojure {:mvn/version "1.12.0"}
com.mysql/mysql-connector-j {:mvn/version "9.1.0"}
;; use log4j 2.x:
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-api {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}
;; bridge into log4j:
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-1.2-api {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-jcl {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-jul {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-slf4j-impl {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}
org.apache.logging.log4j/log4j-slf4j2-impl {:mvn/version "2.24.3"}}
:aliases {:test {:extra-paths []
:extra-deps {io.github.noahtheduke/lazytest {:mvn/version "1.5.0"}}}}}
That's our template projects/deps.edn file.