@stephenmhopper sorry about the delay, forgot about the build. You can try 0.10.0.0-20170526.222812-24

@lucasbradstreet @michaeldrogalis in addition to the small patch i just submitted that batches multiple inserts (which will give significant performance improvements to users), i’m planning to make some postgresql-specific improvements that will use a COPY statement rather than inserts using org.postgresql.jdbc.CopyManager i think it would be valuable to others that are doing ETL with onyx and just want to use an SQL database but are having problems making their writes scale. i think it could open up a whole range of possibilities. however, i’m not sure onyx-sql is the right place to do this. do you have any thoughts on this ?

@lucasbradstreet Great! Thank you!

@lmergen that’s awesome. I’ve wanted that for ages, but we haven’t really focused on SQL enough yet.

@lmergen I’d be happy to have it as part of onyx-sql

say no more!

@lmergen is onyx-sql working well now so far? I can merge your PR soon if so

writes are stable, am not using reads

ah yeah, I need to fix the tests. That’s why I haven’t merged it

ok

tests are only broken because of schema issues

i think the uuid test is broken as well

which makes sense :)

Right, yeah, uuids selects are completely disabled currently

hmmm, are many people using it ?

some, but onyx-sql hasn’t worked on 0.10 for a while, so this is still progress.