@U06BUCH6D https://clojureverse.org/t/what-are-paradigm-differences-between-different-front-end-clojurescript-libraries/2832/4 Might not be the best choice, for a minimal app rum or reagent might be a better fit.

Agree with Claudiu, Om only really makes sense for large applications with complex state requirements. I really like rum for basic stuff.

I don't think the framework will make much difference if you're dealing with canvases and graphics libs - usually you push that to the leaves of the dom tree and it's outside reactjs anyway.

Thank you all! It looks like I should go with reagent, but I have been reading SPA chapter in Learning Clojurescript, which has an easy om recipe for ajax calls to the server. My question is: is it easy to make the same with Reagent? Eg. page loads, user requests server data and so forth….

Also, wanted to know if this React.create-class deprecation and removal slated for React 16 is a threat to using cljs frameworkd at the moment? Thanks..

@U06BUCH6D reagent is the most popular react-wrapper in cljs, dont think u have to worry about react updates (I'm not using reagent so not 100% sure). Be sure to check out https://www.learnreagent.com the free course is quite nice if youre just getting started.

I think all the options have updated to React 16 now. Om.next and om are very different, treat them as separate frameworks. FWIW, I prefer rum to reagent.

Thank you all! Much appreciated..