This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-12-26
Channels
- # adventofcode (12)
- # beginners (141)
- # cider (3)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (76)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-spec (7)
- # clojure-uk (4)
- # clojurescript (15)
- # css (1)
- # duct (3)
- # emacs (5)
- # fulcro (85)
- # keechma (1)
- # leiningen (44)
- # off-topic (29)
- # om (6)
- # parinfer (4)
- # perun (1)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (2)
- # ring-swagger (8)
- # shadow-cljs (5)
- # spacemacs (1)
- # sql (7)
Yes, this help me. But something still not clear to me, if I have component A, B. B is rendered in A, and use a global singleton state {:app/x 0}. If I B has a query [:app/x] and A has query (om/get-query B), when I call (om/tansact! this-b ...) it will say has on query on this path. so I have to transact! with reconciler, is it correct?
not sure if this is relevant, the props in '(dom/div {:height 400 :width 500} "holder")' should has a tag #js
.
But the error I get seems to be related to some difference between js dom object and om.nexts', I think
Any good examples of recursive om.next
parsers around that incorporate remote sync?