Fork me on GitHub
Slack Archive

This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.

2017-05-26

Channels

#om
<
2017-05-26
>
claudiu12:05:33

Hi. Is anybody using om-next with datascript ? Trying to figure out if it’s worth the learning curve & if there are downsides to using it instead of an atom.

danielstockton12:05:45

The downside (if you consider it one) is that set-query! won't work and you'll have to implement your own merge function (if dealing with a remote).

staypufd17:05:14

Is Om-Next close to release yet?

dehli18:05:11

it’s still in alpha, but i think it’s pretty close to a beta release. let me find the message

dehli18:05:45

nvm, slack doesn’t have history

dehli18:05:53

well since it’s a free plan

nikki18:05:20

When i transact how does om know what rerenders to schedule?

nikki18:05:55

Is it cuz mutations say the queries affected in :keys

dnolen18:05:59

gonna try to find time today to cut beta release

anmonteiro18:05:03

@dnolen gonna upgrade React in master before that, sounds good?

dnolen18:05:51

I’ve just created an om-cljs Google Group https://groups.google.com/d/forum/om-cljs

dnolen18:05:19

nothing to see there yet, but it’ll be nice to have a place for discussion outside of Slack

anmonteiro18:05:02

just bumped some deps in master, most importantly React to 15.5.4

staypufd20:05:40

Many people will be excited about Beta arrival. Thanks to whole team who've made Om and Om-Next such great tools to help us make great software.

staypufd20:05:22

And a special Thx to David for his original idea and then not settling on good enough. Your stewardship has helped us all.

dnolen21:05:20

will be making time to be a better steward of this project in the coming months 🙂

dnolen21:05:46

README will be overhauled, and I think we should take the same strategy as Clojure(Script) for docs, sans the CA requirement for docs

dnolen21:05:17

by docs, I mean a proper static site via AsciiDocs

dnolen21:05:48

also would like to see if people want to just jump to ClojureScript 1.9.X

dnolen21:05:21

then we could use spec for the query and get a lot of validation power

anmonteiro21:05:08

I’d particularly like to see what you had in mind for the error stuff

dnolen21:05:31

@anmonteiro yeah will have to come later, needs more hammock 🙂

dnolen21:05:46

just cut 1.0.0-beta1, not going to make a big hub-bub about it yet 🙂 Need to release ClojureScript today

dnolen21:05:58

will work on some docs over the holiday and probably announce something early next week