This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-05-14
Channels
- # beginners (19)
- # boot (28)
- # cider (1)
- # cljs-dev (12)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (246)
- # clojure-belgium (4)
- # clojure-berlin (1)
- # clojure-france (4)
- # clojure-italy (7)
- # clojure-russia (11)
- # clojure-serbia (3)
- # clojure-spec (5)
- # clojurescript (106)
- # cursive (4)
- # datomic (7)
- # emacs (1)
- # jobs (6)
- # leiningen (3)
- # luminus (1)
- # lumo (11)
- # off-topic (1)
- # om (7)
- # onyx (1)
- # pedestal (6)
- # re-frame (16)
- # reagent (4)
- # rum (3)
- # spacemacs (1)
- # unrepl (1)
- # untangled (5)
- # vim (1)
Just to be clear: the basic tutorial is for om
, not om.next
, right? https://github.com/omcljs/om/wiki/Basic-Tutorial
@xiongtx yes. The Om Next tutorials are under the “Om Next” section https://github.com/omcljs/om/wiki#om-next
At 1:22:37 in this video on clojure.spec
: https://vimeo.com/195711510
claims that @dnolen “threw away” the om.next
parser in favor of using clojure.spec
. This doesn’t seem to be the case in om
source: https://github.com/omcljs/om/blob/1.0.0-alpha48/src/main/om/next/impl/parser.cljc
So what’s the story here?
@xiongtx he’s probably speaking about this https://gist.github.com/swannodette/842326cbb6ab35e0d1aa51fb41c5697e
anmonteiro: Huh--what happened w/ that? Waiting for clojure.spec
to move out of alpha?
that was never a commit. not sure when or if it’ll make it to the codebase
that was never a commit. not sure when or if it’ll make it to the codebase