This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-09-25
Channels
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (13)
- # boot (163)
- # cljsrn (23)
- # clojure (70)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-russia (6)
- # clojure-spec (8)
- # clojurescript (47)
- # cloverage (16)
- # cursive (2)
- # editors (1)
- # garden (2)
- # lein-figwheel (1)
- # om (30)
- # om-next (2)
- # perun (2)
- # planck (23)
- # rdf (4)
- # reagent (1)
- # specter (2)
- # untangled (8)
- # vim (7)
@anmonteiro in om-next-fullstack, how is it that the #js
reader macros don’t throw errors when run from clj? 😮
btw I “fixed” your issue yesterday: https://github.com/omcljs/om/pull/785
oh! Hurrah! 😄
re: data_readers… sorry, i’m pretty new to this. I’m guessing boot isn’t getting that bit of data.
I don’t suppose i can just copy and paste it in my boot task? 😛
ahhh, yeah, that’s a known problem
1 sec
@levitanong so this is the issue: https://github.com/boot-clj/boot/issues/47
and this is how you solve it: https://github.com/anmonteiro/om-next-fullstack/blob/master/build.boot#L34
that’s boot.core/load-data-readers!
btw
maybe that should be documented, happy to take a PR adding that to the readme
@anmonteiro Awesome thanks man! With regard to documentation: do you mean the om-next-fullstack readme?
Sure thing 🙂
@anmonteiro PR made
merged, thanks
No prob
@anmonteiro: another thing, I'm thinking this should also be documented in the om.next docs. I foresee a lot of boot users running into this.
What say you?
Maybe it can be an entry in the FAQ, until enough oddities appear to warrant an oddities page. :p
@levitanong should definitely go in the FAQ IMHO
FAQ it is!
{:todo/list [:db/id :todo/editing :todo/completed :todo/title]}
<- taking an example from the todo mvc
does OmNext have any prescriptions for later issuing a query that wants the following information:
{:todo/list [:db/id :todo/editing :todo/completed :todo/title :todo/time-created]}
{:todo/list [:db/id :todo/time-created]}
should be sufficient information, so ideally you would avoid sending the entire query again right?