This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-12-27
Channels
- # adventofcode (1)
- # announcements (5)
- # babashka (11)
- # beginners (41)
- # biff (16)
- # calva (2)
- # clj-together (1)
- # clojure (9)
- # clojure-austin (8)
- # clojure-doc (1)
- # clojure-europe (45)
- # clojurescript (4)
- # clr (14)
- # datomic (13)
- # figwheel (1)
- # fulcro (11)
- # introduce-yourself (2)
- # lsp (31)
- # malli (6)
- # off-topic (3)
- # releases (2)
- # reveal (8)
- # schema (1)
- # shadow-cljs (13)
- # spacemacs (10)
- # timbre (8)
- # transit (3)
- # xtdb (5)
This should sound awfully familiar to Lispers…😁 “While the Baroque rules of Chess could only have been created by humans, the rules of Go are so elegant, organic, and rigorously logical that if intelligent life forms exist elsewhere in the universe, they almost certainly play Go.” ― https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/438088.Edward_Lasker
I've liked the ~5 games of Tak I've played (& am a big fan of the Rothfuss books), but it wasn't enough to get a sense of the strategic depth -- does it really end up going quite deep? That's one of my favorite things about Go, that it has strategic depth greater than any human can fully master. Tak seemed like it might or might not have that quality.