This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-12-03
Channels
- # adventofcode (151)
- # asami (34)
- # babashka (43)
- # beginners (111)
- # cider (2)
- # clj-kondo (6)
- # cljdoc (12)
- # clojure (140)
- # clojure-australia (10)
- # clojure-europe (14)
- # clojure-france (5)
- # clojure-gamedev (5)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-uk (10)
- # clojurescript (20)
- # community-development (9)
- # conjure (1)
- # core-async (4)
- # cryogen (3)
- # cursive (2)
- # datomic (17)
- # emacs (9)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (27)
- # juxt (8)
- # kaocha (2)
- # lambdaisland (14)
- # off-topic (23)
- # pathom (37)
- # pedestal (2)
- # re-frame (8)
- # reagent (8)
- # reclojure (9)
- # reitit (5)
- # reveal (34)
- # shadow-cljs (27)
- # spacemacs (10)
- # tools-deps (123)
- # vim (28)
- # xtdb (17)
https://twitter.com/chrishouser/status/1334358203245752322 chouser makes a cool macro that creates bindings for regexes. Really cool and I didn't know that you could actually name regex capture groups
Hi Clojurians. Im trying to put my finger on a Rich Hickey quote I came across recently but is now slipping and probably morphing in my brain. I think I saw it in the 'forward' section or preamble to a book or article that was software, but I think not directly Clojure related. I recall the gist being something to the effect of software/quality needing to be valued right across its lifetime as opposed to just at some moment in time. That could be it or it could be me happily projecting my own prejudices on what I remember. Does this trigger anything for anyone that they can recall?
Nevermind, found it "“Most systems need to succeed over time, not merely at a point in time. A fascinating exploration of predicative dynamic dispatch, metadata, and other techniques for building flexible systems that can be enhanced without breaking.” Rich Hickeyauthor of Clojure and architect of Datomic
...which was an endorsement against https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/software-design-flexibility
@noisesmith -- I think we actually agree on all that about the collab space, except that I think they paid way too much for Slack userbase
estimate $27B
OK wow I didn't realize they spent that much
10bn of which was borrowed in cash from Citi / Bank of America/ JP Morgan. Must be nice to be in a position to say, Gee, I'd love to buy that company, but I'm ten billion short. Could you float me a loan?
And don't forget the giant bubble of profit-seeking capital that is floating around increasing the value of almost anything that has the slightest forecast of profit. (housing, stock, investment)
well 20B in revenue will open alot of doors
that's how almost everyone does large purchases. car loans and mortgages. not sure why this should be different
well, the difference is large companies tend to use the companies they are buying as collateral to get the loan to buy the company
e.g. if you listed the car you are going to buy as collateral on the loan you need to get to buy the car
I’m getting phishing attacks (via SMS and phone calls) from a company masquerading as a covid contact tracing org. I wish I had some way to trap them, get their address or similar…
The salesforce loan is unsecured