This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-01-11
Channels
- # aws (2)
- # beginners (38)
- # boot (21)
- # boot-dev (8)
- # cider (51)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojars (23)
- # clojure (99)
- # clojure-austin (7)
- # clojure-brasil (1)
- # clojure-dev (8)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (1)
- # clojure-estonia (20)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-italy (3)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-spec (28)
- # clojure-uk (47)
- # clojurescript (47)
- # core-logic (3)
- # cursive (9)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (50)
- # docs (12)
- # emacs (5)
- # fulcro (60)
- # graphql (33)
- # hoplon (8)
- # jobs-discuss (1)
- # keechma (31)
- # lein-figwheel (10)
- # leiningen (4)
- # off-topic (70)
- # om (1)
- # onyx (15)
- # pedestal (5)
- # re-frame (185)
- # reagent (14)
- # remote-jobs (8)
- # ring-swagger (7)
- # rum (17)
- # shadow-cljs (193)
- # specter (6)
- # sql (51)
- # unrepl (8)
I was just reading https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/7phrbu/what_am_i_missing_here/ , in particular, the response comment about "solving climate change via giant sunshades placed at the lagrangian between earth & sun" I have no idea what that means --but is this realistic? placing giant solar panels between the sun & earth so that: 1. we capture the energy via solar panels before it hits the earth 2. earth is cooler as the lightrays doesn't hit the earth
That would be an excellent question to bring to the annual Jet Propulsion Laboratory open house (dates for this year not yet announced). https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/events/special-events.php
Idea of placing solar plants into space has been around for decades. And it’s totally doable but it’s extremely expensive to lift the materials up there.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_sunshade - the total area of the panels would be a massive 3.8 million square kilometers, which by coincidence is approximately the total land area of all 50 United States. Navigationally the shade would need to make course corrections to remain at the L1 Lagrangian point because that point is unstable (be slightly off-course and you fall into either the Sun or the Earth) and I think I read the entire apparatus would be like a huge sail in the solar wind.
IMO it describes the human race pretty nicely that instead of thinking how to change our destructive lifestyle on this planet we think how to block the Sun.
I bet if you could somehow poll all of humanity you’d find more attention to the former idea than the latter, but disappointingly less attention on either idea than would be required.
Better phrasing would’ve probably been “us humans”. 🙂 But anyways, you’re probably right.. Technological advancement/innovations/science is the only way to get out of this mess and luckily there are millions of smart people working on things that make the World/humanity go forward each day. I just hope that technology beats the destructiveness before we begin to boil.
Then again.. There are millions of people who only think how to mine bitcoin with that technology. And billions of people who wonder if you can watch porn with it.
the lifestyle isn't destructive if you tech your way to avoid the destruction.
Hey, tangentially, anybody know if Larry Niven’s “Ringworld” books hold up well against time? I read them in the days of the Apple II and the Sinclair ZX (or maybe more like the C64, can’t exactly remember). https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/71/Ringworld%281stEd%29.jpg
what's the distance with respect to the l1 lagrangian / if we atttached lasers there, is the ping time low enough we can mine bitcoin with all the solar energy collected there?
this pitch would hit all the right words for VCs: bit coin, crypto currency, solar power, clear energy, climate change, rockets, space tech
You forgot deep learning!
They say the L1 Lagrangian is a million miles from Earth, so your roundtrip ping time would be almost 11 seconds.
Ah, you can get by without spending a lot of money on pens. I use Pilot Kakuno with a fine nib (Japanese, which I guess makes it SF by European standards). I think the finer nib makes ink dry faster, but then again I used TR for art including markers and sometimes watercolours, so the entire lightly coated/non-absorbent thing was a plus 🙂
https://www.reddit.com/r/geek/comments/6m9l3h/user_explains_why_we_dont_use_pencils_in_space/
Im looking for a conference something similar to International Conference on Fun with Algorithms (http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/portals/lipics/index.php?semnr=16004). Does anyone know a conference/journal about funny or unnecessary complicated solutions for engineering/computer-science problems? A year ago, I read a blog post from someone who wrote an interesting paper for such a conference (the conference was named after an inventor or scientist ...) but I forgot what he wrote about or what the name of the conference was 😖
there is a hackathon - not sure if that’s in the same zone - http://www.stupidhackathon.com
Hi clojurians, I have a question about general code of conduct on open source projects
I have a pr on a project that has been hanging for a number of months and the last commit on that project was 2013...so it seems pretty dormant
I tried contacting the maintainer to see if I could contribute/help out in some way (improve tests, help out with the deployment etc) to get things moving but the email bounced
and the maintainer does not seem to have been active for a while (number of years on github)
I can of course fork and/or re-implement the project myself (it's a one pager and not that much code, distributed under epl), but the last thing I want it to step on somebodys toes etc...so what is the "correct" process in this kind of situation?
yeah, my worry was abot forking followed by a publish to clojars under a different name
completely appropriate. Clearly document that your code is a fork, who the upstream is, &c. and there's no room for anyone to be offended.
@vijaykiran that is nice, but its missing the (pseudo-)scientific component
does anyone know the name of the font used in this screenshot? https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rakr/vim-one/master/screenshots/new-logo.png
That definitely looks nice
It looks a lot like https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka
@U485ZRA58 I think this might be it: https://www.fsd.it/shop/fonts/pragmatapro/
looks really good, but a little bit out of my range 😂 Thanks for letting me know!
apparently you can get the english-only version without all the bells and whistles for €19, that’s not too bad 🙂
yep, is PragmataPro, https://github.com/rakr/vim-one/issues/8 😂
Haven't found a place to check exactly what bells and whistles are missing from that version :thinking_face:
Why does one pronounce Livingstone as li-ving-stun instead of li-ving-stone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNhE-LQUmOk) One doesn’t say Flint-stun instead of flint-stone either, right?
Worcester, Gloucester … Dorcester
Portland, Oregon is pronounced “turn back, we’re full”
@chris you pronounce leicester different to Gloucester though. Leicester is more like Lest-aah.
Was trying to make an easy Clojure implementation in Python by copying the Java source code for Clojure and came to this: https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/AFn.java Couldnt this be done in a better way? Is this because Java doesn’t have multiple arguments in methods and has to relay on method overloading?
there is actually a call with var args for AFn invoke, but only for >20 params https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/AFn.java#L135
Re: earlier pronunciation thread... try Featherstonehaugh and Cholmondeley ...
It's Fanshaw and Chumly 🙂
@jgh, are you using clojure on android? if so, how is that ?