This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-11-26
Channels
- # beginners (17)
- # boot (3)
- # cljs-dev (2)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (52)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-poland (4)
- # clojure-russia (29)
- # clojure-spec (25)
- # clojure-uk (5)
- # clojurescript (39)
- # cursive (29)
- # data-science (5)
- # datomic (5)
- # fulcro (21)
- # graphql (1)
- # hoplon (20)
- # off-topic (5)
- # pedestal (1)
- # perun (3)
- # protorepl (2)
- # re-frame (7)
- # ring (1)
- # shadow-cljs (19)
- # unrepl (10)
- # vim (4)
hello everyone, i have a fun question
would sites that are now hugely successful have been just as successful had they started as open sourced initiatives?
Speaking off the top of my head, I would imagine it very hard for some portion of the currently successful sites to be as successful had they started as open-sourced initiatives, just because of the problem of keeping a site’s main focus/purpose/direction unified among all of the potential contributors/maintainers. I don’t think this factor would prevent a successful site from becoming as successful, but I do think the rate at which a site would become successful could be slower. Having said that, this hypothetical seems like it could run various paths depending on what successful site you are talking about. Open-source Amazon seems like a very different thing to talk about then open-source Twitter