This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-05-16
Channels
- # beginners (176)
- # boot (11)
- # cider (12)
- # cljs-dev (65)
- # cljsrn (54)
- # clojars (18)
- # clojure (195)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-dev (2)
- # clojure-italy (8)
- # clojure-quebec (1)
- # clojure-russia (51)
- # clojure-serbia (3)
- # clojure-spec (24)
- # clojure-uk (28)
- # clojurescript (41)
- # cursive (14)
- # data-science (60)
- # datascript (2)
- # datomic (111)
- # emacs (6)
- # figwheel (1)
- # graphql (16)
- # hoplon (26)
- # juxt (2)
- # lein-figwheel (3)
- # lumo (12)
- # off-topic (8)
- # om (14)
- # pedestal (22)
- # perun (2)
- # proton (1)
- # re-frame (29)
- # reagent (27)
- # ring (17)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # rum (3)
- # spacemacs (3)
- # unrepl (155)
- # untangled (28)
- # vim (4)
i mean there would probs be an equivalence in any case but... wasm-spitting macros anyone?
Sadly it's also a completely different runtime without a GC.
so you'd need to bring in bohm and probably boost and build a clj runtime from scratch, right?
nah, probably not bohm, just some GC of some sort.
but it is super low level and last I checked the interop between WebAssembly and normal JS was still in-development So no touching the DOM from WebASM