This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-12-23
Channels
- # adventofcode (135)
- # announcements (9)
- # babashka (27)
- # beginners (97)
- # bristol-clojurians (8)
- # calva (7)
- # chlorine-clover (1)
- # cider (3)
- # clara (16)
- # clj-kondo (9)
- # cljdoc (137)
- # clojars (4)
- # clojure (110)
- # clojure-europe (118)
- # clojure-taiwan (8)
- # clojure-uk (19)
- # clojurescript (30)
- # conjure (6)
- # cryogen (32)
- # datomic (11)
- # depstar (1)
- # duct (4)
- # emacs (6)
- # fulcro (73)
- # graalvm (9)
- # keechma (7)
- # leiningen (16)
- # luminus (1)
- # malli (35)
- # meander (3)
- # off-topic (45)
- # pathom (1)
- # pedestal (2)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (31)
- # reitit (2)
- # reveal (17)
- # shadow-cljs (34)
- # tools-deps (11)
- # xtdb (14)
I should probably let folks know: this week will be a bit challenging for me to hack with Christmas just around the corner. After the holiday should be easier.
👍 15
🎄 3
I have a question, ?z
should be nil
in that case?
(m/find [:a {:b [:x :y]}]
[?x {_ _ :as (m/cata ?z)}] ?z
(m/app #(doto % prn) ?z) ?z)
I’m honestly not sure. It is consistent with the results of this
(m/search {:b 2}
{:as (m/cata ?z)}
?z
?z ?z)
But I’m not sure if that is correct or not. Maybe n.oprompt can weigh in after the holiday.