This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-11-15
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # aws (79)
- # babashka (47)
- # beginners (82)
- # calva (65)
- # cider (27)
- # cljdoc (18)
- # cljs-dev (29)
- # clojure (189)
- # clojure-dev (5)
- # clojure-europe (3)
- # clojure-italy (1)
- # clojure-madison (6)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-spec (10)
- # clojure-uk (41)
- # clojured (3)
- # clojurescript (5)
- # clojurex (17)
- # cursive (30)
- # data-science (7)
- # datomic (17)
- # emacs (3)
- # events (6)
- # fulcro (2)
- # funcool (9)
- # graalvm (29)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # joker (3)
- # kaocha (6)
- # malli (5)
- # music (6)
- # off-topic (21)
- # reagent (3)
- # reitit (4)
- # rewrite-clj (8)
- # shadow-cljs (49)
- # spacemacs (7)
- # sql (23)
- # tools-deps (15)
- # vim (43)
- # xtdb (19)
What is the expected way to check for a function? Something like [:map [:handler fn?]]
It looks like fn?
is not one of the symbols exported in https://github.com/borkdude/sci/blob/cb1dc3139a53c680b2bdc1038d2c6e26b975ee8e/src/sci/impl/namespaces.cljc#L96
I could do something like [:map [:handler [:fn fn?]]]
, but I'm wondering if this is something that will be supported for serialization.
sure. PR welcome, it should be added about here: https://github.com/borkdude/sci/blob/ab5ba82fa61ab47b7ace8b3e58bfa633ae8e1f72/src/sci/impl/namespaces.cljc#L201