To clarify my side I would be open to reviewing PRs and do tweaks, but cannot do much "maintenance" at this point

Can definitely push merge buttons on open PRs 😉

The clj-common is a good one, together with adding @hlolli as collaborator 😉

clj-common sounds like a graveyard to me, like clojure-werkz and clojure.contrib. But I'm doing maintainance work now, let's see if 2 of us can't keep lumo running.

I am ok with either, for big stints of work you could also think about applying for Clojurists together... I think the biggest chunks of work I have done were with porting the new compiler changes back into lumo

yes, I could keep that in mind, I will move around slowly to begin with, tough I'd love to make move some shells and js stuff, even the nexe to cljs and make a module from it, perhaps non binary lumo as library, and other ideas I want to experiment with in next 12-24 months. Slow...

What I will do is to mention my musl project in the README https://github.com/arichiardi/docker-lumo-musl Or maybe merge it in ... Don't know, what do you think?

sounds good, but let's not do it right now imo, I was also thinking about the graal-nodejs, but I think that would be easy if the bundler/bootstraper was a module first and not a collection of build.boot with regexes/js/cljs/shell. But compiling statically with musl sounds in itself totally exciting.

well tough, the docker image could be moved, if that's what you mean 🙂 or for users to compile locally with musl, is going to be a headache to reply tickets for.

can you send me a lumo compiled with musl via email, or send me a download link, I'm curious to see the elf signatures and linking.

Yes that is exactly what I mean, we can add instructions and dockerfile there

and a text which says, ask Andrea if in trouble 😄

well we can't merge a thing right now until the ci builds pass, so let's talk soon

Yeah good point