> As we do work within Calva to combine LSP/REPL-provided info for IDE ergonomics, I'd hate to miss out on contributing such work language-agnostically to other clojure-lsp-using tools. 1. Is there any way to somehow forward or share the REPL connection to clojure-lsp so that it becomes the "source of truth" for whatever language features IDEs gain when jacked-in? The REPL is still connected to the IDE for inline evaluation, debugging etc, but language features exclusively come from clojure-lsp (or at least that's the idea). 2. This (perhaps hand-wavingly) simplifies lsp-client/IDE language-feature logic for clojure-lsp consumers a. eg they no longer have to implement Go To Definition themselves b. eg they no longer have to implement the merging of LSP and REPL provided completions themselves c. etc 3. And this allows contributions and optimizations to c-lsp to only have to be done once, sharing the spoils with all Of course those benefits are only possible if it's technically feasible and otherwise desirable to have the LSP also embed NREPL or something, or whatever it is that it would actually take 🤷:skin-tone-4:

I am really loving the clean-ns support! It is marvelous! I am wondering (if the ability is not already present and I’ve just missed it) if it would make sense for clean ns to also sort imported class names. For example:

(ns some.ns.here
  (:import
   (a.lovely.java.package Fabulously Sorted Absolutely)))

(ns some.ns.here
  (:import
   (a.lovely.java.package Absolutely Fabulously Sorted)))