Clojurians Log v2

As far as I know, clojars follows the “GAV” (group, asset, version) coordinate model from Maven, so I think the only way to represent two “variants” is to give them distinct GAV coordinates

based on the limited info I have about what you want to do, it seems the most natural would be to alter the asset with additional variant info, e.g. “$asset-variant1” and “$asset-variant2"

apologies: its “artifact” not “asset”

https://maven.apache.org/repositories/artifacts.html

I’ve never used this, but you may be able to exploit the “classifier” property of the GAV coordinate, rather than split the artifactid namespace

You'll probably end up having to use mvn directly to do this as I do not believe classifiers are well-supported by Clojure tooling (for publishing, they are supported for consuming but perhaps not well-documented). I guess I'd take a step back and ask: why do you want to publish two variants? What are the behaviors that are affected by the dependencies?

Uberjars? Those are applications. It's unusual to deploy applications to Clojars -- it's for libraries.

Oh, my bad, I have a library and I want to deploy it to clojars. Edited the description 😓

> why do you want to publish two variants? My library is a cljc library. And it depends on clojurescript because it uses the analyzer. however, the clojurescript isn't required if the user is only using it for clojure, and have cljs as a dependency can sometimes pull in other dependencies which can cause incompatibilities with libraries used in a clojure project. Hence, I thought I should bundle them into two different projects, one purely clj and one cljc. It is also possible that I wasn't excluding the correct transitive dependency and this is the real problem, not the fact that the project pulls in cljs.

If you have a .cljc project, it's generally up to your users to have a dependency on ClojureScript if they're using... ClojureScript. That's my thinking on it.

HoneySQL is (nearly) all .cljc and needs ClojureScripts for testing but does not include a dependency on cljs directly.

> If you have a .cljc project, it's generally up to your users to have a dependency on ClojureScript if they're using... ClojureScript. That's my thinking on it. I see, let me try excluding cljs as a dep and see if I can get it to work. thanks for the ideas 🙂

Well, you only need the cljs dep in your project for dev/test. Your users don't need that dep if they're Clojure (JVM) only. That's the way to look at it.

Look at https://github.com/seancorfield/honeysql/blob/develop/deps.edn for example. ClojureScript is needed for testing, but that's it.

> it depends on clojurescript because it uses the analyzer That can all be handled by reader conditionals -- so it only uses the analyzer for cljs and whenever your library is used by cljs projects, they'll already have cljs as a dependency -- so that dependency shouldn't be a problem?

(I just realized I linked you to a deps.edn project -- and I see this thread is in #leiningen -- but the same principle applies, but with profiles in lein instead of aliases; I haven't used Leiningen since 2015)