This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-03-05
Channels
- # announcements (8)
- # asami (70)
- # babashka (28)
- # beginners (163)
- # calva (7)
- # cider (15)
- # clj-kondo (47)
- # cljs-dev (45)
- # clojars (2)
- # clojure (56)
- # clojure-europe (24)
- # clojure-italy (1)
- # clojure-losangeles (2)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-spec (2)
- # clojure-uk (53)
- # clojurescript (46)
- # data-oriented-programming (15)
- # data-science (10)
- # datahike (2)
- # defnpodcast (1)
- # depstar (27)
- # emacs (35)
- # figwheel-main (28)
- # fulcro (38)
- # girouette (1)
- # graphql (16)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # kaocha (9)
- # keechma (2)
- # leiningen (6)
- # lsp (87)
- # malli (19)
- # membrane (16)
- # pathom (4)
- # re-frame (11)
- # shadow-cljs (25)
- # spacemacs (2)
- # testing (12)
- # tools-deps (14)
- # tree-sitter (4)
- # xtdb (20)
Maybe stating the obvious, but if it’s a non-snapshot, and available locally, that one will be used.
yup, I'm thinking about it from the dependency confusion angle. If I specify [org.clojure/clojure "1.10.0"]
and version "99.0" is available elsewhere, then I won't get the "99.0" version. I'll get what I specified
vs if "1.10.0" is available in a different repo, it's not as clear which will get picked up
IMO the right answer is "don't let that non-owners of that artifact upload it elsewhere", but I'm making sure I understand the problem as it stands today