This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-09-16
Channels
- # announcements (19)
- # babashka (13)
- # beginners (7)
- # calva (8)
- # cider (25)
- # clj-kondo (12)
- # cljsrn (7)
- # clojure (60)
- # clojure-australia (5)
- # clojure-europe (59)
- # clojure-france (14)
- # clojure-gamedev (2)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (43)
- # community-development (8)
- # core-async (2)
- # cursive (15)
- # datomic (75)
- # deps-new (31)
- # depstar (1)
- # fulcro (6)
- # graalvm (53)
- # holy-lambda (1)
- # juxt (3)
- # jvm (13)
- # kaocha (8)
- # lsp (109)
- # malli (14)
- # off-topic (62)
- # pathom (11)
- # pedestal (12)
- # polylith (12)
- # releases (5)
- # sci (5)
- # shadow-cljs (15)
- # sql (16)
- # tools-deps (27)
- # vim (1)
- # xtdb (14)
Hi
I'm playing around with the tick library.
Since https://github.com/juxt/tick/releases/tag/0.5.0-RC1 (between commit 71d7d0262f964606b9072e25811fc80a8b98cefe and b0ac0ccf44c0db528275f7a98c63ad825b6c7d59) the following example in the docs doesn't work anymore:
(t/+ (t/time "12:00") (t/new-duration 5 :minutes))
I saw in a previous doc string on tick.alpha.api/+
that t/>>
should be used instead. I assume this is intended behavior because (t/>> (t/time "12:00") (t/new-duration 5 :minutes))
has the same result.
Should the examples in the the docs be updated when dates/time are shifted with t/+
-> t/>>
and t/-
-> t/<<
?
thanks. the docs have moved now and are up to date. link on the readme has changed
Hi @simon.el.nahas. We have updated the docs... But pushing them out is taking a while. Master branch is all up to date