This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-12-22
Channels
- # adventofcode (37)
- # beginners (74)
- # boot (2)
- # boot-dev (31)
- # cider (88)
- # clara (109)
- # cljs-dev (63)
- # clojure (96)
- # clojure-argentina (1)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (2)
- # clojure-france (2)
- # clojure-germany (3)
- # clojure-greece (2)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-norway (1)
- # clojure-spain (1)
- # clojure-spec (25)
- # clojure-uk (46)
- # clojurescript (26)
- # cursive (19)
- # data-science (5)
- # docs (2)
- # duct (18)
- # editors (2)
- # emacs (3)
- # figwheel (2)
- # fulcro (29)
- # graphql (3)
- # hoplon (143)
- # juxt (7)
- # klipse (1)
- # leiningen (5)
- # lumo (1)
- # monads (1)
- # off-topic (23)
- # onyx (49)
- # powderkeg (6)
- # re-frame (4)
- # reagent (8)
- # ring (3)
- # shadow-cljs (24)
- # specter (70)
- # sql (1)
- # unrepl (96)
- # yada (3)
Hi all, have bumped up against a couple of issues in writing a Machfile: https://gist.github.com/crimeminister/f4f57ef5eafb8d8a8d0a5e87e48403dc
One is that I can't seem to require '[lumo.util]
to make use of the lumo.util/file?
function
And the other is that using a CLJS regex breaks things
Robert Medeiros:
{
mach/props [token-pattern #"_authToken=(.+)"]
;;mach/props [token-pattern (js/RegExp. "_authToken=(.+)")]
main (println token-pattern)
}
i.e. using js/RegExp
works where using #""
does not
Any tips or insight appreciated
Turns out the easy fix for being unable to use lumo.util/file?
is to use mach.core/file?
.