This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-08-03
Channels
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (104)
- # boot (30)
- # braveandtrue (1)
- # cider (6)
- # cljs-dev (95)
- # cljsjs (16)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (106)
- # clojure-italy (15)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-norway (3)
- # clojure-russia (1)
- # clojure-spec (40)
- # clojure-uk (53)
- # clojure-ukraine (1)
- # clojurescript (200)
- # code-reviews (2)
- # cursive (1)
- # datascript (3)
- # datomic (32)
- # editors (28)
- # gorilla (6)
- # graphql (8)
- # hoplon (1)
- # jobs (8)
- # jobs-discuss (5)
- # jobs-rus (1)
- # keechma (13)
- # leiningen (5)
- # luminus (3)
- # lumo (53)
- # off-topic (5)
- # om (5)
- # om-next (1)
- # onyx (56)
- # parinfer (7)
- # protorepl (22)
- # re-frame (47)
- # reagent (37)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring-swagger (9)
- # specter (7)
- # vim (14)
- # yada (30)
Hey guys. I've learned a decent amount of Clojure and really like the language a lot. I'd like to do web development with it and hope to find work someday. I have two Clojure Leiningen templates/micro-frameworks in mind that I'm thinking of choosing from. First is just the Compojure/Ring, possibly Luminus stack, and the second is Reagent. Which one of these two is more likely sought after in Clojure companies?
@jmb they are not really exclusive, and in my experience I’ve seen them very often paired when doing full-stack clojure
So if you’re choosing one to start from, you really have to pick first on which side of the stack you want to be
@nilrecurring Oh so from what I understand, it doesn't seem like either side of the stack has significantly more opportunities than the other.
I would say so, yes. The market demand since some years has shifted significantly towards full-stack skills, so we are supposed to do a bit of everything (which I personally enjoy, but it’s definitely a tradeoff)