This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-08-05
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # babashka (5)
- # beginners (151)
- # calva (43)
- # clj-kondo (23)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # cljs-dev (6)
- # cljsrn (10)
- # clojure (60)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-europe (26)
- # clojure-gamedev (14)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-spec (10)
- # clojure-uk (80)
- # clojurescript (66)
- # clojureverse-ops (4)
- # community-development (7)
- # conjure (8)
- # datomic (15)
- # deps-new (1)
- # docker (27)
- # emacs (2)
- # fulcro (13)
- # honeysql (13)
- # java (5)
- # jobs-discuss (43)
- # lsp (121)
- # luminus (13)
- # malli (1)
- # off-topic (73)
- # pathom (12)
- # polylith (29)
- # practicalli (4)
- # re-frame (35)
- # reagent (44)
- # remote-jobs (5)
- # rewrite-clj (2)
- # sci (7)
- # shadow-cljs (125)
- # sql (4)
- # tools-deps (9)
- # xtdb (5)
I'm trying to understand the difference, if there is one, between an array of objects and named classes, i.e. Object[]
vs. MyClass[]
, in terms of memory layout and performance differences.
From what I read, arrays of non primitive types hold only references
I believe the difference only exists in the type system (and controls polymorphism around updates and access to the contained objects).
if you make an array of MyClass[] there will be runtime verification of the types of elements
Yeah, one of the few runtime type checks that is built into the JVM, right?