This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-08-30
Channels
- # aws (2)
- # beginners (139)
- # boot (9)
- # cider (1)
- # clara (2)
- # cljs-dev (35)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (112)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (9)
- # clojure-greece (6)
- # clojure-italy (13)
- # clojure-russia (160)
- # clojure-seattle-old (1)
- # clojure-uk (79)
- # clojurescript (85)
- # clojutre (1)
- # community-development (11)
- # core-async (32)
- # cryogen (2)
- # cursive (5)
- # data-science (16)
- # datomic (2)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (29)
- # funcool (1)
- # graphql (4)
- # immutant (5)
- # instaparse (20)
- # jobs (2)
- # juxt (6)
- # leiningen (11)
- # luminus (21)
- # lumo (1)
- # off-topic (7)
- # onyx (20)
- # parinfer (33)
- # pedestal (4)
- # re-frame (41)
- # reagent (34)
- # ring-swagger (14)
- # rum (5)
- # spacemacs (9)
- # specter (11)
- # sql (14)
- # test-check (3)
- # yada (20)
Is there a way to pass a worker thread-pool (instead of number of worker threads) to Immutant? I’m looking at this, but to no avail: http://immutant.org/documentation/2.1.4/apidoc/immutant.web.undertow.html#var-options
@kumarshantanu is that supported by undertow?
I don’t know, @jcrossley3 I’m just exploring at the moment
well, most of those "tuning" options are just passed straight through to the embedded undertow web server. i don't believe it exposes access to its thread pool directly.
Thanks. I can see there’s a method Undertow.Builder/setWorker
that sets a worker - I will look around for more info in case there’s any possibility.