This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-05-03
Channels
- # aleph (6)
- # announcements (4)
- # babashka (73)
- # beginners (117)
- # calva (25)
- # chlorine-clover (59)
- # cider (21)
- # clara (3)
- # cljdoc (8)
- # cljs-dev (54)
- # cljsrn (15)
- # clojure (65)
- # clojure-france (5)
- # clojure-spec (3)
- # clojure-uk (13)
- # clojurescript (79)
- # conf-proposals (1)
- # conjure (17)
- # core-logic (11)
- # datomic (21)
- # fulcro (82)
- # graalvm (11)
- # helix (7)
- # jobs-discuss (11)
- # joker (2)
- # juxt (3)
- # local-first-clojure (1)
- # luminus (5)
- # nrepl (61)
- # off-topic (12)
- # pathom (70)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reitit (3)
- # rum (1)
- # shadow-cljs (58)
- # sql (1)
- # tools-deps (26)
- # xtdb (3)
The js-framework-bench results has been updated with helix (as well as reagent 0.10) https://rawgit.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark/master/webdriver-ts-results/table.html
✔️ 8
👏 16
Interesting results. Helix is clearly faster than reagent, but not by much. Seems worth an investigation into what's happening there.
Hey @lilactown just wanted to let you know that helix (and all projects using string requires for JS packages) are now properly supported on cljdoc https://cljdoc.org/d/lilactown/helix/0.0.10
👍 8
🎉 4
👏 4
🙏 4
I think there's probably some improvements that could be made to the helix code in the benchmark, but don't have time to dig in atm