This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-03-27
Channels
- # announcements (3)
- # aws (7)
- # babashka (11)
- # beginners (96)
- # clojure (15)
- # clojure-europe (9)
- # clojure-germany (2)
- # clojure-italy (1)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-poland (3)
- # clojure-serbia (1)
- # clojurescript (13)
- # depstar (28)
- # fulcro (34)
- # graalvm (5)
- # honeysql (5)
- # malli (11)
- # off-topic (27)
- # pathom (9)
- # polylith (74)
- # portal (10)
- # re-frame (13)
- # releases (1)
- # ring (8)
- # shadow-cljs (3)
- # spacemacs (10)
- # tools-deps (8)
I have a situation where I have a relationship in one of my models in mr frontend fulcro db with a 1 to 1 relation ship with another model, something like
{:person/id 3
...
person/pet [pet/id 5]}
The other model (`pet` in this case) does not contain this relationship because it seems redundant. If I have several of both of these types of records, what would be "right" way to derive the inverse relationship (being able to go from pet/id
to person/id
. I have a few questions about some possible solutions.
• Is there a way to query this from the db? I know something like this would be possible in Datalog, but EQL documentation didn't mention anything simillar
• Is there a way to create state derived from other state within fulcro? Something that would listen to the person/id
map and derive a mapping from pet/id
to person/id
. I've done this before in re-frame
, though their implementation is not super performant
• Am I completely off base and I should just add the person/id
relationship to the pet
model.
Even if #3 is the way to go, if there are ways to do #1 or #2 it would be great to know.Three is the intentional design because it is performant, simple, and trivial to implement
You can implement reverse lookups by creating indexes, which is how datomic does it. There is nothing in fulcro that does that for you
There are plenty of places where could hook in such a thing, probably as a custom transaction processing plugin based on the included one
How about the many to many scenario?
Post <--many--> Topic
In my particular case all of the content is individually genenrated. So instead of running queries against a remote, I gathered that it makes more sense to sync all the data to the client.
The next question is whether I should dump all of it into Fulcro or create a local remote using Datascript, Datahike or Asami and then run my queries against that.
The downside seems to be, as the user navigates through the app, the database would start living in both `local db` and `fulcro` (unless I clean up fulcro as you use the app)
The design is an intentional one: The database and EQL are intentionally naive, and just walk a literal graph. This is a performance and clarity decision. If you want to choose a local database with more capabilities that is more feature rich, you are certainly capable of doing that. Everything from rendering to transaction processing is pluggable. You’re living in a world of distributed systems. Cache invalidation is just a thing you have to cope with, so choose your poison 🙂
What would be your suggestion here? An additional remote? or plugging in a new rendering and transaction handler? It definitely makes sense! I'm just trying to understand the downsides/upsides of each approach
My suggestion is to not complicate your code. use pathom to generate edges where you need them, query that from the server, and don’t worry about it on the front-end at all if you can.
query for things from the server when you need them, let pathom connect the dots, use them as naively as possible on the front end
anything else is a dramatic increase in complexity. I guess if you find a real need to do that, you can of course…YMMV
Thank you for the perspective! I think letting it be remote only right now makes sense for my current stage. Being local/offline first is going to be critical, but your thoughts makes it obvious. I'll solve that later
Good Morning all, If I do this:
(ns app.myns
(:require
[com.fulcrologic.fulcro.dom :as dom]
[clojure.pprint :refer [pprint]]))
(pprint (div :.ur.blah))
I get this:
#js {"$$typeof" #object[Symbol(react.element)], :type "div", :key nil, :ref nil, :props #js {:className "ur blah"}, :_owner nil, :_store #js {}}
How does Fulcro turn declared div
into a function?It’ll help you to watch these videos to understand what dom/div
is doing https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVi9lDx-4C_TBRiHfjnjXaK2J3BIUDPnf
@U0VP19K6K, the mystery I am trying to solve is how the dev
declaration converts to a function in the source. Its in this namespace: https://github.com/fulcrologic/fulcro/blob/develop/src/main/com/fulcrologic/fulcro/dom.cljs
Possibly, but in the source, you simply (dev :.ui.main)
, where is the div
declared as a function or macro looking at the fulcro.dom
source. Sorry, I am pretty new to Clojure and trying to figure out how things work.
This is probably more of just Clojure question.
There is also https://github.com/fulcrologic/fulcro/blob/develop/src/main/com/fulcrologic/fulcro/dom.clj
This creates the macro version https://github.com/fulcrologic/fulcro/blob/develop/src/main/com/fulcrologic/fulcro/dom.clj#L220
And this creates the client side js function version https://github.com/fulcrologic/fulcro/blob/develop/src/main/com/fulcrologic/fulcro/dom.clj#L240
I would watch the videos I posted above… as far as I remember Tony touched on this stuff
OK, so basically all of the declared values in dom.cljs
are converted to functions using the macros. Therefore, all of these functions will have the same arguments.
…well the one macro creates the macro versions and the other macro creates the function versions
Actually, I am not far enough into it to understand the videos. I am working up to it. Trying to understand some basic things. Also, I tend to learn much better after I dig into coded and understand it.
Yeah, I wouldn’t worry about all this macro stuff… just use them, there’s a lot to learn before worrying about how the dom macros/functions are created
Yeh, I am beginning to see how Tony layers the macros. Thats crazy, he is super smart.
Thank you and enjoy supper.
How about the many to many scenario?
Post <--many--> Topic
In my particular case all of the content is individually genenrated. So instead of running queries against a remote, I gathered that it makes more sense to sync all the data to the client.
The next question is whether I should dump all of it into Fulcro or create a local remote using Datascript, Datahike or Asami and then run my queries against that.
The downside seems to be, as the user navigates through the app, the database would start living in both `local db` and `fulcro` (unless I clean up fulcro as you use the app)