Fork me on GitHub
#figwheel-main2018-07-12
>
dnolen11:07:51

does figwheel-main compose repeated options like cljs.main, can I merge build description files?

mfikes11:07:21

@dnolen Yeah, I was chatting with Bruce and he said --build base:dev should work.

mfikes11:07:02

If I understand correctly, -co and -b should also merge.

mfikes11:07:23

But there may still be bugs surrounding that, as it wasn’t working for me a while back.

bhauman13:07:45

This is a friendly reminder to use the -pc option to quickly verify behavior 🙂

dnolen13:07:39

right, thanks!

bhauman13:07:02

easy to forget, I forget all the time

dnolen13:07:06

figwheel-main is so good by the way - love it!

bhauman13:07:15

Thanks!!!!

bhauman13:07:20

that's great to hear

bhauman13:07:52

I was working within a severe informational deficit when I first wrote figwheel

bhauman13:07:19

trying to set it up for a solid future

flowthing14:07:10

I agree, it's fantastic. I just used it for the first time for a quick prototype and it was a breeze. Works great.

pesterhazy19:07:53

Yeah we use it more and more and it just works, amazing!

john19:07:56

@bhauman (or if someone knows) I was using figwheel.client/start programmatically. I can't find a similar function in figwheel.main. Is there one?

dnolen19:07:26

there is a figwheel-main/start, but I think that starts REPL & builds together if that’s what you want

john19:07:23

bah! it was a typo! Thanks @dnolen

john19:07:54

ah, that's on the clojure side. The old one worked from the CLJS side.

john23:07:52

@bhauman is there a CLJS side function I can tap into to initiate a new connection from the browser? I'm working on the multi-repl webworker stuff.

john23:07:54

Ah, k. So I'll need to bring in that as a separate dep, right?

john23:07:17

ah this is pretty cool. Probably a smaller dep for the webworker too