This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-02-15
Channels
- # announcements (8)
- # architecture (9)
- # autochrome-github (1)
- # babashka (48)
- # beginners (55)
- # calva (36)
- # cider (16)
- # clj-commons (1)
- # clj-kondo (38)
- # cljs-dev (44)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (164)
- # clojure-europe (35)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-norway (10)
- # clojure-uk (23)
- # clojurescript (50)
- # conjure (24)
- # core-async (1)
- # cryogen (2)
- # cursive (38)
- # datalevin (11)
- # datascript (2)
- # datomic (13)
- # duct (1)
- # emacs (16)
- # events (12)
- # exercism (3)
- # figwheel-main (7)
- # fulcro (26)
- # honeysql (5)
- # integrant (1)
- # jobs (3)
- # kaocha (6)
- # lsp (72)
- # malli (22)
- # nextjournal (35)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (34)
- # pathom (5)
- # polylith (8)
- # portal (40)
- # re-frame (14)
- # reagent (42)
- # reitit (1)
- # releases (1)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # reveal (9)
- # sci (2)
- # shadow-cljs (13)
- # sql (3)
- # tools-deps (33)
- # vim (25)
👋 Is it just me or does the second exercise (Lucian's Luscious Lasagna) break the FP paradigm? I had to define a function that used global state to compute a value and it felt kinda wrong.
I am not a FP lawyer but as long as the global state is immutable, that seems OK to me. The problem is with mutability, not with scope. A function definition (like +) is another example of (conceptually) immutable global state.
1