A bit off topic: are any of you using elfeed? I would really like to have a higher level overview of the feeds and their unread count. Is that possible, or are there other readers that do this?
I've used Elfeed for years but mostly just using out of the box features. Afaik, such functionality you looking for doesn't exist by default. As with everything emacs, you can do anything you can think of yourself if you know elisp. for example you can hook into the queries Elfeed does, do a simple count of all the feeds on your list and count the unread ones, then create a new view that provides this overview. If you're not familiar with Elisp but still willing to experiment, I've found cursor to be pretty good as a coding tool if you don't know the language, though it's not that great for Elisp. It does a lot better if you feed it a bunch of example code, so in this case the code that runs Elfeed. Last, if you don't wanna do any of that, the best thing that's a quick compromise is to have a easy shortcut to switch between the filters you can add to elfeed. I used to filter by certain keywords and then cut down from maybe 20-30 unreads to just 2-3 I wanted to look at now
Thanks! I'm quite the novice at elisp, but this could serve a good learning exercise.
yea if you have the time and interest, this is a great opportunity, especially because I think it won't be that hard to get good results. Good luck!
Thanks 😊
> higher level overview of the feeds this? https://github.com/manojm321/elfeed-dashboard
Excellent, thanks!
Has anyone using adjust-parens been able to configure it so it doesn't kick in if the previous sexp is more than a line away?
E.g. assuming
(comment
(previous-form)
|
)
Current behavior after TAB
(comment
(previous-form
|)
)
Desired behavior
(comment
(previous-form)
|
)It works for me exactly this way. On the first TAB press it indents, on the second it kicks into the previous sexp
OK, I now see this happens only in the (comment) form for me as well, actually...
hmm.. it could be interacting weirdly with clojure-toplevel-inside-comment-form maybe...
Yep, confirmed. I just set clojure-toplevel-inside-comment-form to nil, and it behaves as I'd like it... Hmm it's a shame, as I'd like to keep that. I guess I'll inspect the code when I can and see if I can patch the behavior of one or the other...
I guess since it considers it to be top-level, adjust-parens doesn't consider there could be a valid point to indent to (without altering sexps).