This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-10-21
Channels
- # announcements (3)
- # babashka (98)
- # beginners (69)
- # chlorine-clover (6)
- # cider (24)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojure (97)
- # clojure-australia (2)
- # clojure-berlin (6)
- # clojure-dev (57)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (4)
- # clojure-europe (19)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-nl (10)
- # clojure-seattle (1)
- # clojure-uk (44)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (13)
- # clojurescript (45)
- # cursive (4)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (32)
- # emacs (7)
- # events (5)
- # fulcro (17)
- # java (12)
- # jobs (1)
- # lumo (2)
- # malli (5)
- # observability (16)
- # off-topic (1)
- # pathom (3)
- # pedestal (4)
- # rdf (14)
- # re-frame (54)
- # reagent (4)
- # releases (3)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # reveal (55)
- # shadow-cljs (34)
- # spacemacs (14)
- # specter (9)
- # tools-deps (16)
- # xtdb (7)
Anyone here familiar with paredit behavior?
Someone almost certainly is, but perhaps not someone who is on-line checking messages at this time.
You could try asking your question, and check back later to see if anyone answered it.
I use smartparens now, which is a newer version of paredit. Used paredit for the first few years of Clojure.
Well, here’s the question. Paredit used to put an extra space between items when you ‘slurped’ an item into a sexp. Now, there is no whitespace between them. It seems that might be a setting. Where would it be?
@U05254DQM what do you like better about smartparens?
@U061KMSM7 smartparens seems more flexible in configuration and works for all languages, even non programming languages like org-mode and markdown