This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
- # announcements (3)
- # babashka (64)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (12)
- # calva (21)
- # cider (7)
- # clj-kondo (16)
- # cljdoc (1)
- # clojure (49)
- # clojure-dev (2)
- # clojure-europe (10)
- # clojure-germany (3)
- # clojure-italy (1)
- # clojure-uk (13)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (6)
- # clojurescript (2)
- # code-reviews (21)
- # data-science (2)
- # datomic (3)
- # emacs (20)
- # events (1)
- # fulcro (2)
- # graphql (4)
- # java (3)
- # malli (14)
- # off-topic (45)
- # re-frame (2)
- # shadow-cljs (7)
- # tools-deps (167)
- # vrac (14)
- # xtdb (4)
Anyone know how to set set a custom fill-column on a read-only results buffer? I'm running
cider-pprint-eval-last-sexp to output some stuff to a popup buffer. The output only looks good at a fill over 100 columns. I don't want to change the fill globally. Just for
cider-make-popup-buffer. Bah. As I'm typing this out, I'm thinking this is such a one-off I should just hardcode the change there in
cider-make-popup-buffer and eval it when I need to do this.
Ah hah. https://docs.cider.mx/cider/usage/pretty_printing.html#print-options
Has anyone else made the switch from Spacemacs to Doom? Seems neat, but I’m not sure I can live without
SPC k ….
I've tried Doom many times over the last couple of years and found it lacking the user experience of Spacemacs. Doom seems interesting if you want to custom and create your own way of doing things. Personally I want to get on and do things with Emacs, rather than spend time configuring it. The Doom keybindings feel un-natural and far less organised, especially across major modes. There were still many Clojure keybindings missing last time I tried Doom. I am still not keen on the Doom install process, I much prefer the simplicity of a git pull. I didnt find Doom any faster to run on the same machine doing the same tasks (where those tasks were supported). Doom is a great project, its just not for me.
I’ve experienced a surprisingly large performance difference between Doom and Spacemacs, even on newer hardware.
I go back and forth, Doom has increasingly felt more polished with the features it does have to me, while I like Spacemac's raw volume of features
Did you use
SPC k much when using Spacemacs, and have you found a replacement in Doom? :thinking_face:
Why you can't use doom-emacs with that package installed and add a keybinding to
SPC k for that?
I’m considering doing just that, but I’m wondering whether Doom users have a different approach that might be worth learning.
doom-emacs has a lot of opt-in/opt-out features and on same time allow you to install/add/set anything that you would do on vanilla emacs 🙂
you can easily use doom-emacs macros for installing a package with
package! and map a keybinding with
This achieved what I was looking for:
(use-package! evil-lisp-state :custom (evil-lisp-state-global t) :config (evil-lisp-state-leader "SPC k"))