This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-07-31
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # beginners (1)
- # boot (91)
- # cljs-dev (11)
- # cljsjs (8)
- # cljsrn (38)
- # clojure (89)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (1)
- # clojure-russia (6)
- # clojure-spec (14)
- # clojure-uk (4)
- # clojurescript (25)
- # data-science (1)
- # datascript (3)
- # datavis (4)
- # emacs (25)
- # events (1)
- # jobs-rus (3)
- # off-topic (1)
- # proton (3)
- # re-frame (19)
- # reagent (5)
- # specter (10)
- # yada (1)
for the people that work under osx, what is the emacs build you use ? is aquaemacs anything ? or should i just run vanilla emacs ?
right, that’s pretty much the same as i get with brew install —with-cocoa —srgb emacs
, right ?
Not sure; if you want more information (and a second opinion) try http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/271/what-is-the-difference-between-aquamacs-and-other-mac-versions-of-emacs.
"If you just want Emacs without any complications: Emacs for Mac OS X” — I personally haven’t had any problems with it.
right, yeah, i found that, i just wanted to hear other people’s rationale to use a specific version
I use brew install emacs
with some options (that I don’t remember 😦). My hope is that Homebrew will do a good enough job of keeping Emacs up to date, without my having to think about it.
That’s a valid point, but if you want to set up Emacs in the same way on non-OSX systems, you couldn’t use brew
, right?
right, so that statement was mostly related to using vanilla emacs, rather than aquamacs or something
Because if you’re going through the terminal, you’re going to have a whole mess of keybinding and colorscheme errors to sort through.