This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2023-10-09
Channels
- # announcements (2)
- # babashka (11)
- # beginners (9)
- # biff (7)
- # calva (20)
- # catalyst (1)
- # cider (8)
- # clerk (46)
- # clj-kondo (18)
- # clj-otel (2)
- # clojure-brasil (22)
- # clojure-europe (18)
- # clojure-gamedev (23)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-norway (14)
- # clojure-uk (6)
- # clr (1)
- # datomic (13)
- # emacs (1)
- # hoplon (13)
- # hyperfiddle (53)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # java (23)
- # malli (7)
- # obb (35)
- # off-topic (31)
- # polylith (2)
- # portal (9)
- # rdf (15)
- # reitit (12)
- # releases (3)
- # ring (4)
- # shadow-cljs (6)
- # solo-full-stack (3)
Hi Friends! Datomic Cloud 1067-9276 is now available and it's jam-packed with performance improvements! Forum announcement here: https://forum.datomic.com/t/datomic-cloud-1067-9276/2327 Templates here: https://docs.datomic.com/cloud/changes.html#1067-9276
@U1QJACBUM, can you confirm the version of Linux used on compute nodes? I can’t find a reference to a “08/09/2023” version of Amazon Linux AMI in https://docs.aws.amazon.com/linux/al2023/release-notes/relnotes.htmll
I think there was a mixup of date formats…. 08/09/2023
is in the Datomic release notes, but the closest I can get for the Linux 2023 AMI is 2023.1.20230809
- a month earlier.
Yes it is 2023.1.20230809
I think we just formatted the date this way and added it to the log. I can update the release notes to say 2023/08/09? and maybe link to release notes here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/linux/al2023/release-notes/relnotes-2023.1.20230809.html Would that make it clearer?
A link to the release notes would be awesome. I tend to use that to tightly match the Java version using asdf
. And I imagine for those doing things with docker, having a link to specifics would be useful too.
It might be nice to use the ISO standard for formatting dates (as Amazon has done) so as to remove the ambiguity around MDY or DMY -I now realize that your date is actually correct but I just wrongly assumed ISO order for the date (despite those slashes). Also, think the link to the current version of corretto should be updated: https://docs.datomic.com/cloud/ions/ions-reference.html#jvm-settings
@U1QJACBUM, do you know if this version of DC fixes the issue of the incorrectly reported dependency version conflicts?