Has anyone seen this?

clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: entity, attribute, and new-value must be specified
	at datomic.client.api.async$ares.invokeStatic(async.clj:58)
	at datomic.client.api.async$ares.invoke(async.clj:54)
	at datomic.client.api.sync$eval2142$fn__2147.invoke(sync.clj:84)
	at datomic.client.api.protocols$fn__14323$G__14277__14330.invoke(protocols.clj:72)
	at datomic.client.api$transact.invokeStatic(api.clj:181)
	at datomic.client.api$transact.invoke(api.clj:164)

Google is turning up nothing

What transaction data did you send in @jonwalch ?

@ghadi

[{:db/id 1,
  :foo/apple 0N,
  :foo/processed-time #inst "2020-02-27T02:00:35.561-00:00"}
 {:db/id 2,
  :foo/apple 0N,
  :foo/processed-time #inst "2020-02-27T02:00:35.562-00:00"}
 [:db/cas 3 :user/speaker 0N 100N]
 [:db/cas 4 :user/speaker 85N 100N]
 [:db/cas 5 :bar/running? true false]
 {:db/id 5,
  :bar/end-time #inst "2020-02-27T02:00:35.569-00:00",
  :bar/result? false}]

Don’t send in your own :db/id, use tempids

Which are strings

What version of the compute stack are you running? CAS with a boolean might be problematic- I forget.

I should clarify: only send in integer :db/ids that Datomic handed you @jonwalch

thats what those are 👍

1 is an integer above

trying to find my datomic cloud version

Did you print or prn?

yeah I fuzzed the ids

I should've clarified, my bad

I’m debugging this from my phone, so try to help me out 🙃

Ok if your ids are legit, then take out the boolean CAS and see if you get an error. If you do, I’ll file a report (need your compute stack versions)

DatomicCloudVersion 8812

ComputeCFTVersion 535

Is that what you're looking for?

Thanks

Changing the code, will report back in ~10

@ghadi removed the cas, working flawlessly

thank you so much!

You might want to upgrade your stack to latest. I feel like I’ve filed this bug before with the crew but I’ll double check

In datomic cloud 8812 we had a problem with a big transaction creating entities with multiple levels of nested maps... some children ended up on the wrong parent... the same code on newer version worked correctly. I tried looking at release notes but didn't see bug fixes related to that

Good morning @ghadi @shaun-mahood! I successfully got an complex atomic transaction working this morning! Thanks again for your help!

woot! thanks for following up.

hopefully the first of many!

https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/pull.html#as-example This example is wrong Should be

[(:artist/name :as "Band Name")]

apologies for the cross post, but i was wondering if anyone has an answer to this forum post regarding a single transaction of two facts about the same entity resolved by a composite tuple? thanks! https://forum.datomic.com/t/conflict-when-transacting-non-unique-values-for-entities-resolved-by-composite-tuples/1367