This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-05-27
Channels
- # aleph (1)
- # beginners (48)
- # cider (34)
- # clojure (27)
- # clojure-dev (15)
- # clojure-uk (21)
- # clojurescript (27)
- # data-science (3)
- # datomic (10)
- # instaparse (30)
- # lumo (85)
- # off-topic (3)
- # perun (2)
- # portkey (24)
- # re-frame (13)
- # reagent (17)
- # ring (1)
- # shadow-cljs (77)
- # spacemacs (1)
- # test-check (3)
- # yada (4)
Does anyone know why d/tx-range
doesn’t report on the datoms that appear transacted in a new database? In such a database, I see system datoms transacted at times [0 54 56 63]
.
@dustingetz thanks, read that one few times. It is just, almost everyone in google groups uses db/sharding/system/nodes/connections /transactors/peers very loosely (or at least db-as-application-data vs db-as-actual-datomic-db-term - interchangeably). And depending on actual meaning – answer's meaning changes dramatically.
@misha the meaning is per database, though several databases adding up to exceed 10 billion datoms behind the same transactor would encounter some perf challenges as well. 🙂 And you’re probably safe assuming when anyone on the Datomic team says “database” they mean database rather than peer, transactor or something else. Precision in use of terminology is definitely a goal there in community support.
@bkamphaus thank you