This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-03-25
Channels
- # aws (1)
- # beginners (60)
- # boot (12)
- # cider (7)
- # cljs-dev (8)
- # cljsrn (24)
- # clojure (169)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-russia (3)
- # clojure-spec (15)
- # clojure-switzerland (1)
- # clojure-uk (24)
- # clojurescript (120)
- # core-async (9)
- # datomic (3)
- # emacs (2)
- # gsoc (3)
- # klipse (2)
- # leiningen (4)
- # numerical-computing (13)
- # off-topic (95)
- # om (7)
- # onyx (1)
- # powderkeg (2)
- # protorepl (2)
- # re-frame (6)
- # reagent (58)
- # ring-swagger (1)
- # rum (28)
- # untangled (42)
- # vim (6)
I’ve noticed some of my colleagues writing {:unique/id “some-val”}
where I would expect to see a lookup ref i.e. vector. Is this fine/not problematic?
@uwo what you've seen was probably a map form inside a transaction (http://docs.datomic.com/transactions.html)
the advantage of using those compared to lookup refs is that the target entity does not need to exist yet.