This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-03-28
Channels
- # aatree (1)
- # admin-announcements (5)
- # beginners (5)
- # braid-chat (2)
- # cbus (2)
- # cljs-dev (8)
- # cljsrn (13)
- # clojure (101)
- # clojure-chicago (1)
- # clojure-greece (11)
- # clojure-russia (77)
- # clojure-taiwan (1)
- # clojure-uk (5)
- # clojurescript (73)
- # core-async (5)
- # core-matrix (1)
- # cursive (5)
- # datomic (10)
- # devcards (44)
- # emacs (16)
- # hoplon (207)
- # keechma (5)
- # lein-figwheel (1)
- # leiningen (5)
- # liberator (3)
- # melbourne (1)
- # om (171)
- # onyx (25)
- # parinfer (1)
- # proton (2)
- # re-frame (28)
- # reagent (50)
- # untangled (7)
- # yada (4)
@bkamphaus and friends: is Datomic ‘complete’? Last major feature release was Jan last year, with 0.9.5130. Is anything new going to be added/updated?
I don't think anyone believes Datomic is "complete" :)
i agree!
oh, good
of course. the key disadvantage to that rule is that it doesn’t allow for letting non-members knowing whether the club is still meeting at all, or not
Hey, kind of a philosophical question, but datomic’s pricing model seems a little hostile to a microservices architecture, since every new microservice peer I add winds up counting as a CPU. I can sort of shield the datomic bits behind a bespoke API or the REST API, but then I’m losing a lot of the benefits its distributed architecture, eg the caching. Just curious if this is something the datomic team has thought about or has recommendations about...
@timgilbert: as a datapoint - we had a similar question and even had a call with Datomic people ~9 months ago. They didn't offer any alternative licencing models at the time.
Is it possible to call d/pull
on a collection? Instead of
(map #(d/pull db pull-exp %) eids)