This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-12-18
Channels
- # adventofcode (1)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (118)
- # boot (39)
- # cljs-dev (6)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (62)
- # clojure-mke (1)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-russia (51)
- # clojure-spec (8)
- # clojure-uk (9)
- # clojurescript (101)
- # code-reviews (1)
- # cursive (2)
- # datascript (9)
- # datomic (80)
- # emacs (4)
- # hoplon (27)
- # jobs-discuss (1)
- # off-topic (1)
- # om (1)
- # onyx (18)
- # protorepl (2)
- # re-frame (13)
- # reagent (13)
- # rum (9)
- # test-check (23)
so - judging by this list - datomic does NOT support using indexes backwards. At least there is such feature request - it says there is no way to use index in reverse in queries. =/
(I can copy-paste the feature request description, if it sounds like I've confused something with something)
"Add support to efficiently iterate indexes "backward" so that a single index could easily support all inequality predicates". and comment says that current advice is to create field with reverse sort order
@tonsky what's your ideal persistence architecture now then, datomic perhaps?
it is super simple to sync datascript with datomic, @josh.freckleton