Fork me on GitHub
#datascript
<
2016-05-09
>
Niki07:05:45

@thedavidmeister: it’s just a half of JS unboxed int range

Niki07:05:55

first half for entids, second for tx ids

Niki07:05:58

@fasiha: yes, I’d recommend starting with basic datomic concepts first, because there’s little to none DS tutorials

verma14:05:39

@fasiha: I am working on a series as I learn, not exhaustive or complete yet, but pragmatic. http://udayv.com/clojurescript/clojure/2016/04/28/datascript101/

fasiha14:05:20

@tonsky: thanks for weighing in (and thanks for datascript 😄). Because I'm a big baby and didn't want to set up datomic and figure out these schemas etc., I've managed to cobble together enough of a mental picture via your articles, @verma's posts, and http://learndatalogtoday.org to become comfortable referencing the Datomic docs.

fasiha15:05:43

If I can ask a question about data layout. Suppose I'm writing a crowdsourced translation site like http://tatoeba.org, which has several phrases in various languages, and people can add translations for them, and vote for which translations are the best. I'm envisioning storing something like this in datascript:

{:original/text "Bonjour"
 :original/language :fr
 :original/translations [{:translation/text "Hello"
                         :translation/language :en
                         :translation/author {:user/username "user1"
                                              :user/email ""}
                         :translation/upvotes [{:user/username "user10"
                                                :user/email ""}
                                               {:user/username "user11"
                                                :user/email ""}
                                               ; ... other users
                                               ]}
                         ; another translation
                         ]}
My question is, does it make sense to use a schema with :original/translations, :translation/author, and :translation/upvotes as refs? And with :original/translations & :translation/upvotes having cardinality many, while :translation/author having cardinality of only one?

fasiha15:05:39

I'm trying to get a handle on when I should use refs versus just a list, and if three levels of nested refs is too much (i.e., will lead to overly complicated queries)

verma18:05:20

I would keep the data pretty flat and use refs to refer around stuff, this could become a nightmare when querying stuff

verma18:05:34

as far as I know though simple_smile

verma18:05:57

behind the scenes they will all be converted into datums

verma18:05:15

so I guess its upto you, but how you model your data and your mental picture of it is important, I have come to admire the flat structure of things and refs to link things together, but I am just starting to learn things .. so ...

fasiha23:05:23

@verma, thanks! I think I see what you mean. Let me try to make some changes and report back simple_smile