@pat We have this issue, I am wondering whether we should rename our surface CPS abstractions.
What do you think?
Hygiene maybe?
We could go with something missionary or core.async like not sure.
partial-cps is very portable, but I also ran into issues with async/await keywords when running an experiment to port it to basilisp.
If the bindings are hygienic and its still broken id argue thats a cljs problem breaking userspace, but i am not tracking cljs changes idk. Might be simple as renaming the macros
I agree. It works if are imported under an alias. I will have to look into it more closely.