datahike 2026-06-23

@pat We have this issue, I am wondering whether we should rename our surface CPS abstractions.

What do you think?

We could go with something missionary or core.async like not sure.

partial-cps is very portable, but I also ran into issues with async/await keywords when running an experiment to port it to basilisp.

If the bindings are hygienic and its still broken id argue thats a cljs problem breaking userspace, but i am not tracking cljs changes idk. Might be simple as renaming the macros

I agree. It works if are imported under an alias. I will have to look into it more closely.