This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-07-28
Channels
- # aleph (1)
- # arachne (4)
- # beginners (13)
- # boot (18)
- # clara (7)
- # cljs-dev (156)
- # cljsrn (278)
- # clojure (163)
- # clojure-conj (5)
- # clojure-dev (1)
- # clojure-losangeles (1)
- # clojure-poland (2)
- # clojure-sg (1)
- # clojure-spec (15)
- # clojure-uk (17)
- # clojurescript (275)
- # data-science (5)
- # datomic (23)
- # emacs (10)
- # leiningen (1)
- # lumo (16)
- # off-topic (98)
- # onyx (10)
- # parinfer (83)
- # re-frame (18)
- # reagent (47)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring (1)
- # ring-swagger (5)
- # rum (6)
- # specter (8)
- # vim (5)
I’m curious: do people who have used pandas in Python feel like plain Clojure is lacking in comparison? to we need an equivalent in Clojure?
I’m scrolling through the endless pandas API and it seems like (1) a lot of the stuff is possible in vanilla Clojure (2) it seems very complected (for example Styler.format(formatter[, subset]) Format the text display value of cells.
) (3) there is some genuinely nice stuff in there (like parsers and descriptive stats) which could be their own libraries
I would say a good bit of the nicer stuff is covered by core.matrix.dataset.
I also would agree with both points 1 and 2...