This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-03-13
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # beginners (53)
- # boot (355)
- # braid-chat (4)
- # cider (15)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # clojure (88)
- # clojure-austin (1)
- # clojure-new-zealand (4)
- # clojure-russia (46)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (61)
- # component (2)
- # cursive (3)
- # data-science (5)
- # datomic (6)
- # dirac (49)
- # editors (8)
- # emacs (15)
- # funcool (15)
- # jobs (1)
- # ldnclj (10)
- # melbourne (1)
- # off-topic (14)
- # om (61)
- # om-next (2)
- # onyx (32)
- # re-frame (28)
- # reagent (19)
- # test200 (1)
- # vim (3)
New Matrix Multiplication benchmarks - Neanderthal up to 60 times faster than core.matrix with Vectorz
https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/4a8o9n/new_matrix_multiplication_benchmarks_neanderthal/
It would be great if Neanderthal simply implemented the core.matrix protocols, then people could use it as a core.matrix implementation for situations where it makes sense. I really think it is an architectural dead-end for Neanderthal to develop a separate API. You'll simply get less users for Neanderthal and fragment the Clojure library ecosystem which doesn't help anyone. In the absence of that, we'll just need to develop separate BLAS implementations for core.matrix.