Clojurians Log v2
cursive
I’m sure this has been brought up before: the inline results are great! One reason I find myself opening the REPL pane again is to confirm a long-running form I sent to the REPL is actually sent. Put another way, when you send a form to the REPL that takes a few seconds to run, you don’t get any feedback you sent the form until the result comes back. It’d be great to get some kind of feedback that the form was sent and we’re waiting for the result.
Yes some sort of progress display is definitely in my plans. There was also some discussion a while ago as well about making it clearer that something has been evaluated when the result is very fast, since the inline display gets replaced so fast you don't even see it flicker a lot of the time.
Can I show the full namespaces when searching for symbol usages?
e.g. the modal will show different usages across files like "core.clj" but I’d like to see the namespace instead
There’s a [m] icon with a tooltip that says “File Structure”, but toggling it doesn’t seem to change anything
As a sidenote, the i icon with the tooltip “Show import statements” also doesn’t seem to hide symbol usages inside (:require) forms
Could you show a screenshot of the view you're talking about? There are a bunch of different usage views, I just want to be sure we're talking about the same thing.
I have a feeling that you'll want to upvote this: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IJPL-60969
Yes, there are a couple of IntelliJ bugs around this, very frustrating.
and it's been years...
yes, that’s the usage modal I was talking about in the YouTrack issue, thanks @imre
Similar to the issue I was having with intellij ultimate + gateway backend, I get weird repl prompt behavior with CodeWithMe. Is this an intellij bug or something w/ Cursive? (The left window is the CodeWithMe "remote" connection)
i don't think code with me is supported intentionally. i think it's accidental, that it works even this much.
It would be nice if it could work, intentionally. Any idea what it would take?
It has the same problems that IntelliJ remote development using Jetbrains Gateway has.
both of these features are important for remote development
I also wish IntelliJ would be viable for remote development, then we shouldn't be worrying about screen sharing that much. It would lock our emacs colleagues out of pair programming or we would need to maintain a separate process and tooling for them to pair. Anyway, it's a question to @cfleming how feasible is it to fix this issue.