Thanks, I’ll look at this.

Thank you, Colin!

I actually find this behavior nice

I prefer the balanced let bindings, but this is clearly a preference option that should be available to enforce or not

Yes, this is deliberate since the destructuring forms can be very large (like your example). If you’d like a switch for that I can add one - I tend to try to resist more config options until people complain loudly enough.

i think it's a valid strategy. 🙂 in this case, i would put the map on a new line anyway. but i'm curious what others think of it...

i just took a look at our codebase and it appears our team is ok with not balancing destructuring forms in let bindings. all good for now. :-)

@cfleming Hi, I would really appreciate very much if there would be an option to balance this kind of let bindings. Also very often I want to align the pairs in some forms (like test and then statements in a cond or case) because of readability, is this something that others want? I really like Cursive, great job 👏 Colin.

Definitely better! Thanks, I’ll look at this, I haven’t looked at the new bookmarks stuff in detail yet.

i'm looking forward to it. 🙂

I just commented over on the issue with a few thoughts after looking at it briefly.

I’m actually working on namespace ordering in general at the moment.

In the meantime, there's an ok plugin to sort requires. https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/13222-clojure-namespace-sort