@cfleming Do you have anywhere where users can vote on features? So that you actually work on the features that matter the most to Cursive users?

For instance, I'd give any voting points to "automatic requiring of :refers). That's something that would make my life a lot easier.

@rauh I don’t yet, but I’m planning to add it to Cursive itself. I’ve investigated various web options, but the advantage of doing it in Cursive is that it’s automatically tied to the licence ID - I think making people sign up would be a significant barrier.

I’m planning two main categories - new features and paper cuts, i.e. small bug fixes that would improve your life.

I’m going to tie it to GH issue tags, and hopefully will be able to display the voting on the issue itself by editing a comment or something.

I’ll try to add that soon, a lot of people have asked for it and it will allow me to direct my efforts better.

@cfleming Yeah that might get you there quickly, just add a "votable-issue" tag to the features you want votes on. And then post the (filtered) issue link here in slack.

That would get you some kind of guidance.

The actual issues would be presented in a voting panel in the settings, probably, or in a popup from the Help menu or something similar.

But yeah, which issues were presented for voting would be triggered by one of two tags on them.

Sounds great.

@cfleming Yes, also when the clojure keyword is namespaced https://puu.sh/y4XS3/bc508699f8.png

@dmarjenburgh You can edit the scope of the search and also create your own scope for it.

I know, that would be a project specific workaround

Is it possible to update cursive to run with leiningen 2.8.0?