This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-02-08
Channels
- # aleph (11)
- # arachne (7)
- # aws (1)
- # bangalore-clj (4)
- # beginners (24)
- # boot (128)
- # bristol-clojurians (23)
- # cider (1)
- # cljs-dev (43)
- # cljsrn (6)
- # clojure (178)
- # clojure-austin (3)
- # clojure-chicago (1)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (14)
- # clojure-finland (15)
- # clojure-france (6)
- # clojure-italy (18)
- # clojure-portugal (2)
- # clojure-russia (67)
- # clojure-spec (148)
- # clojure-uk (55)
- # clojurescript (199)
- # core-async (4)
- # cursive (18)
- # datascript (5)
- # datomic (120)
- # devcards (3)
- # dirac (53)
- # emacs (11)
- # events (3)
- # gsoc (7)
- # jobs (1)
- # lein-figwheel (25)
- # leiningen (5)
- # lumo (12)
- # off-topic (29)
- # om (174)
- # om-next (2)
- # onyx (7)
- # perun (10)
- # protorepl (6)
- # re-frame (12)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring (19)
- # ring-swagger (25)
- # rum (6)
- # spacemacs (13)
- # sql (3)
- # untangled (88)
- # yada (7)
i've just started using clojure.spec
but as i see there is no explicit support for it yet.
what's the recommended way to resolve the clojure.spec/fdef
macro?
if i resolve it as def
then i must make sure the fdef
comes before the function definition,
otherwise it masks out the actual function definition, right?
I’m starting up my Figwheel CLJS repl using the Use clojure.main in normal JVM process
option in the Run Configurations
. That means I do not have any test integrations. Is it possible to have this together with Figwheel somehow?
@roelof It’s at the bottom of this page: https://cursive-ide.com/userguide/ (Choosing to receive EAP (beta) builds)
@nicoschneider in your code, put cursor on the symbol you want to custom-resolve, alt+enter (or click the lightbulb) and click "Resolve XXX as ..."
@favila nice, thanks! typical atlassian?? ;D @onetom is the interested party tho, i think 🙂
i mean, there’s a minus button :face_with_rolling_eyes:
jetbrains, sorry
getting my services all confused ;D
I suspect there's some technical reason why ad-hoc entry of items is harder, but I don't know
@favila @onetom @nicoschneider I’d like to be able to claim some deep underlying motivation, but the truth is it’s just something I haven’t got around to.